data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72dd5/72dd52fd011f5c5f8476bb5707dbe631223790a6" alt=""
He went to last night's premiere in London, and started twittering his thoughts on it at about 9.40 this morning. Jonathan Ross is a huge comics fan, a huge movie fan (& respected reviewer), and has nearly 120,000 followers, so he can certainly be considered an influencer.
What does he think?
"Watchman probably the most faitful adaptation of a comic to the big screen. Ending changed very much for the better."
"Great sets, costumes, special effects - Rorshach especially good."
"Downside - too long, too reverential, lacks pace and feels a little dull at times. In short - I love it and at same time am unimpressed !"
"Opening montage sequence to watchman just brilliant though. Had me grinning from ear to ear."
He also responded to fans' questions - for example:
TheRonster: "@Wossy Is the problem not that they've tried to make a ponderous GN into an action packed flick by artificially adding action beats?"
Wossy: "@theronster No. The action beats are exactly as they occur in the novel. The problems lie elsewhere. i'll go into it on Film 2009."
&
tonycottam: "@Wossy so does it come with a double rating, one for non-comic types (yes they exist!) and one for ultra geeks like me?"
Wossy: "@tonycottam Non comic fans will be a bit confused. Dara O Brian was there and he said a lot of it went over his head."
&
scaryjones: "@Wossy What was it about the original ending that you thought was weak?"
Wossy: "@scaryjones Didn't think it was weak, just think it's one of those ideas that works in comics that wouldn't work on big screen."
Hats off to @Wossy for some brilliant twittering.
Update: There was also an official Watchmen twitterer tweeting from the red (yellow) carpet.
No comments:
Post a Comment